Top 8 Phyllo Alternatives

Phyllo is one of the most well-known tools for pulling authenticated data from creators, but it’s not the right fit for every team or every project. 

And depending on how quickly you need access to that data or how many creators you’re working with, it might not even be the best option. 

Phyllo is built for teams with technical expertise who need direct information, but some users find it slow and complex in some situations.

After spending over 5 years working with platforms that rely on creator data, we know where data providers excel and where they can fall short. 

If you’re looking for something more flexible, faster, or easier to work with at scale, there are several Phyllo alternatives worth checking out.

The 8 best Phyllo alternatives (Quick Overview)

1. Influencers.club – Best for API-driven, large-scale public creator data for discovery and CRM enrichment.

2. CreatorIQ – Best for end-to-end influencer marketing and workflow automation.

3. HypeAuditor – Best for fraud detection and audience authenticity checks.

4. Upfluence – Best for eCommerce brands managing discovery, outreach, and affiliate tracking.

5. Modash – Best for developers needing API access to a vast public creator database (annual commitment).

6. Aspire – Best for D2C brands managing creator relationships and full campaign workflows.

7. Klear (Meltwater) – Best for integrating influencer insights with media intelligence.

8. Traackr – Best for global brands focused on compliance, brand impact, and relationship management.

What makes a good Phyllo alternative

If you’re here, you likely already know where Phyllo excels and where it can get in the way. 

Teams working with creator data often face specific challenges that lead them to explore other options. We get it, and you’re in the right place.

Keeping the most common challenges in mind, we’ve picked the best Phyllo alternatives for 2025, based on:

• Faster access to public data, without needing creator consent every time.
• Better discovery tools, with large databases and filters for niche, audience, and engagement.
• Simpler API integration, using API keys instead of managing OAuth tokens.
• Scalability, to handle thousands of creators without slowing down.
• Flexible pricing, more suited for discovery and analysis at scale.

If any of this sounds like what you need, you are in the right place. Let’s dive in!

Top 8 Phyllo Alternatives

From API-first solutions to full influencer marketing platforms, all Phyllo alternatives below bring something different to the table. 

Depending on whether you need in-depth analytics, better creator discovery, or seamless campaign management, there’s a tool designed to match your workflow.

1. Influencers.club

Influencers.club is built for teams that need fast, large-scale access to verified creator data. 

While both influencers.club and Phyllo deliver creator data via API, the key difference lies in the type of data and how you get it. 

Influencers.club creator API is most powerful for building creator discovery tools, enriching CRMs with reliable data, and running market analysis and lookalike modeling at scale.

It combines easy integration, advanced filtering, and real-time public data access, making it one of the most developer-friendly and scalable creator data APIs available.

Pros:

• Flexible and scalable endpoints

• • Discovery API- Search and filter 190M+ creators (with emails) by niche, keywords, follower range, location, engagement, etc.
  • Enrichment API – Turns usernames or emails into complete creator profiles with 40+ data points
    • By username – real time enrichment for 99% of profiles globally
    • By email – has the largest email database enabling unmatched enrichment by email
  • Lookalike API – Find creators similar to your existing partners (search by username)

• The API operates on a credit-based system – each request consumes credits based on the data and features retrieved
• It uses API key authentication, avoiding the complexity of OAuth consent flows and token management. Its RESTful architecture ensures seamless compatibility with any backend or data pipeline, letting you integrate quickly without extra overhead.
• Access to over 40+ data points:
  • Verified emails for every profile
  • Follower counts, estimated engagement rates, and content categories
  • Age, gender, location, language, etc.
  • Links and data from profiles on any other social platform

Cons:

• Doesn’t offer private data (mostly used for identity verification), but it can do a background check to find profiles on other platforms, identify whether there’s violence and hate speech mentioned on any profile on any platform. 

Pricing & Plans: Influencers.club offers different plans starting from $199/month, and the plans including API access start from $249/month.

Both the API and the platform are on a credit-based system, so you’ll pay only for what you need. Custom pricing is available based on your API usage, data needs, and scale. 

Best Fit: Influencers Club is ideal for creator economy platforms and marketing agencies that prioritize fast, scalable access to public creator data. 

If you need to power large-scale discovery engines, enrich CRM records, or run market analysis without the delays of consent workflows, influencers.club is the best Phyllo alternative.

2. CreatorIQ

CreatorIQ is built for large organizations that need more than just data. It provides full control over their entire influencer marketing operation. 

While Phyllo focuses on delivering authenticated creator data via API, CreatorIQ provides an all-in-one platform that handles everything from discovery to payments. 

It’s not a direct API substitute, but for teams that want deep analytics, workflow automation, and enterprise-level data governance, CreatorIQ is a good Phyllo alternative.

Pros:

• Offers comprehensive analytics, including audience insights, content performance, and ROI tracking, ideal for large-scale campaigns.
• Supports first-party data integration if creators connect accounts.
• Workflow automation and CRM tools streamline the entire influencer marketing process from outreach to payment.
• Strong API and enterprise integrations make it easy to connect with your existing MarTech stack.
  

Cons

• Not focused on real-time, authenticated data at the level Phyllo delivers.
• Requires significant setup, training, and resources to fully implement.
• Best suited for long-term, high-volume operations, not quick data integrations.

Pricing & Plans: CreatorIQ doesn’t list prices publicly, and you can get a custom quote based on your organization’s scale and needs. Expect enterprise-level pricing to match the depth of the platform.

Best Fit: CreatorIQ is perfect for large enterprises or global agencies managing complex influencer campaigns. If your team needs end-to-end capabilities, from discovering creators to measuring detailed ROI, and you have the resources to handle a full-scale platform, CreatorIQ is a good Phyllo alternative. 

3. HypeAuditor

HypeAuditor is a go-to tool for teams that want to make sure their influencer partnerships are built on genuine reach and engagement. 

While it doesn’t provide authenticated, real-time data like Phyllo, it focuses on public data analysis to assess influencer credibility. If your priority is getting data, spotting fake followers, and running due diligence before a campaign, HypeAuditor is a strong Phyllo alternative.

Pros:

• It can detect fake followers and inflated engagement to avoid wasted ad spend.
• Offer detailed filters for audience demographics so you can find influencers that align with specific target markets.
  

Cons:

• Relies on estimates from public data, lacking the exactness of authenticated data feeds.
• No access to sensitive creator data, such as income verification or identity checks.
• You’ll need extra tools or manual effort for outreach.
  

Pricing & Plans: HypeAuditor offers several pricing tiers, but exact details aren’t publicly listed. Basic plans are typically around $399/month according to third-party sources, while full access and API features require custom quotes.

Best Fit: HypeAuditor is best for brands and agencies that need to safeguard against influencer fraud before signing contracts. It’s a good Phyllo alternative for teams who prioritize pre-campaign validation.

4. Upfluence

Upfluence is designed for brands and agencies that want everything in one place – from finding influencers to managing payments. 

While Phyllo offers authenticated data through an API, Upfluence focuses on streamlining the entire influencer marketing process using publicly available data. 

It’s not about deep, permissioned insights – it’s about making campaign management easier at scale.

Pros:

• It combines discovery, CRM, outreach, and payments into one platform
• A large influencer database with AI-powered search helps you find the right creators quickly
• eCommerce integrations with Shopify, WooCommerce, and more make it easy to track sales and manage affiliate commissions
• Built-in outreach tools let you manage communications without switching platforms.
  

Cons:

• Depends on public data estimates, so it doesn’t provide the kind of verified, real-time metrics Phyllo users might need.
• It can be pricey if you don’t need the full suite of tools.
• Doesn’t support sensitive data access like income verification or identity checks.
  

Pricing & Plans: Upfluence doesn’t list prices publicly. You’ll need to contact their team for a custom quote based on your campaign volume and feature needs. 

Best Fit: Upfluence works best for mid-size to large brands, particularly in eCommerce, looking for an all-in-one solution to manage influencer campaigns.

5. Modash

Modash delivers massive reach with a focus on helping you discover influencers through public data with a robust API. 

Phyllo specializes in authenticated, consent-based data via API, while Modash offers programmatic access to one of the largest databases of public creator profiles. 

So, if you need scalable discovery and audience analysis built directly into your workflows, you can definitely use Modash instead of Phyllo.

Pros:

• Over 250M+ creator profiles across Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube
• Good filtering options for targeting by demographics, location, engagement, etc.
• Well-documented API – easy to integrate influencer data into your own tools or platforms.
• Transparent pricing tiers suit both small teams and larger organizations.
  

Cons:

• API access comes with additional charges on top of regular subscription plans, and it requires an annual commitment.
• Fake follower detection is based on estimations, not direct data from platforms.
• Contact finder is a paid add-on and depends on public availability.
• Lacks outreach and campaign management features.
  

Pricing & Plans: Modash API pricing starts at $16,200 per year, with an annual commitment.

Best Fit: Modash is a good alternative for teams that need API-driven access to a vast pool of influencers for discovery and audience analysis. 

It’s built for those who prioritize scalable, data-rich discovery without the need for authenticated, consent-based data streams like Phyllo offers.

6. Aspire

Aspire is built for brands that don’t want just data. They want to create lasting partnerships with influencers, ambassadors, and even their own customers. 

While Phyllo focuses on delivering authenticated data via API, Aspire helps you discover, manage, and activate creators within a full campaign workflow. 

If your focus is on building a creator community and running end-to-end influencer campaigns, Aspire offers the tools to get it done.

Pros:

• Strong relationship management features to help you turn influencers into long-term brand partners.
• Automates product seeding, content approvals, and campaign tracking to save time.
• Community Search lets you find influencers within your own customer or follower base.
• Integrates well with e-commerce tools (Shopify) for sales tracking and affiliate management.
  

Cons:

• Analytics focus on campaign outcomes, not deep creator vetting or authenticated data.
• Discovery capabilities are more limited compared to platforms with larger global databases.
• Pricing can rise quickly as you scale campaigns or need more advanced features.
  

Pricing & Plans: Aspire doesn’t publish pricing, but offers tiered plans like Create, Elevate, and Enterprise. Custom quotes are based on team size, features needed, and campaign volume.

Best Fit: Aspire is ideal for D2C brands and agencies that want to focus on building strong creator relationships and managing campaigns efficiently.

7. Klear

Klear, now integrated into Meltwater, is built for companies that want detailed, data-driven insights into influencer performance as part of a broader media strategy. It focuses on public data analytics to help enterprises discover and vet influencers at scale. 

If you’re already using Meltwater or want a powerful tool for discovery and campaign measurement, Klear is a good alternative.

Pros:

• AI-powered ‘Klear Score’ and psychographic audience analysis give you deep insights into influencer quality and brand fit.
• Advanced filters and competitor benchmarking help refine your discovery process.
• Part of the Meltwater ecosystem, allowing integration with media monitoring and social listening tools.
• Enterprise-grade analytics support data-driven decisions across influencer campaigns.
  

Cons:

• Uses public data and proprietary estimates, not authenticated, real-time data like Phyllo.
• Some users consider the platform complex compared to other simpler solutions.

Pricing & Plans: Klear doesn’t publish pricing. As part of Meltwater or as a standalone solution, you’ll need to request a demo and get a custom quote based on your team size, needs, and data volume.

Best Fit: Klear is best suited for mid-market and enterprise brands looking for advanced influencer discovery, vetting, and campaign tracking. If you need a Phyllo alternative for a sophisticated public data analysis over authenticated, permissioned data, Klear is a good solution.

8. Traackr

Traackr is designed for large global brands that treat influencer marketing as a strategic, long-term investment. 

This is a good Phyllo alternative only if your priority is brand equity, compliance, and global campaign measurement.

Pros:

• Rich analytics with proprietary metrics like the Brand Vitality Score (VIT)
• Strong CRM features that allow detailed influencer relationship management across markets
• Advanced discovery tools, network analysis, and competitive benchmarking
• API access enables integration into enterprise BI or marketing systems
  

Cons:

• High pricing targets large enterprises, making it less accessible for smaller teams.
• Users complain about the complex platform setup that requires dedicated resources and training
• Lacks direct support for transactional processes like influencer payments.
  

Pricing & Plans: Traackr does not publish pricing. Enterprise clients must contact the sales team for custom quotes based on region, program size, and feature needs. It’s positioned at the higher end of the market.

Best Fit: Traackr is best for large, data-focused enterprises that need a system of record for influencer marketing. It’s ideal for regulated industries and global brands where compliance, brand safety, and deep performance insights are crucial. Teams needing authenticated, real-time data would find Phyllo more suited, while Traackr fits strategic, long-term brand impact goals.

To Sum Up

Phyllo is a good choice when you need data from individual creators, but it’s not built for speed, scale, or broad discovery. 

If your priority is accessing a large, verified pool of creator data without the friction of OAuth, there are some great Phyllo alternatives depending on your goals.

Influencers.club creator API stands out with the largest database of 190M+ creators, including verified emails and cross-platform data for each export. 

Thanks to the depth of our data, we can match and enrich any list you have, making your workflows smarter and more efficient.

If you need to discover more creators or enrich your CRM, influencers.club is your best alternative to Phyllo. Start your free trial to get your API key and test it for free.