An API-to-API comparison
HypeAuditor API vs
Influencers.club API
A side-by-side comparison of the HypeAuditor API and the Influencers.club API: what each one publishes about price, what its endpoints and OpenAPI specifications document, and what a live call actually returned in August 2026. Dashboard-only features are out of scope on both sides.
Updated August 2026
HypeAuditor API vs Influencers.club API: the short answer
HypeAuditor sells a campaign platform, and the API is that platform exposed as endpoints. Beyond reports and Discovery, its published specifications document 31 campaign-management operations, 14 media-plan operations, social-listening listeners, a creator CRM carrying network, contract and payment status, e-commerce reporting with revenue and ROI, and spend reporting with paid and planned payments. Its analytical report is deep — a live Instagram advanced report returned 63 top-level fields on 26 August 2026 — and its Audience Quality Score is the authenticity grade this category benchmarks against.
Influencers.club sells the decision layer, priced per call. 21 documented endpoint groups and 72 operations run off one credit pool: Discovery across six platforms with 90+ documented filters, enrichment by handle or by email in either direction, batch jobs, similar creators, audience overlap, exclusion lists, and campaign monitoring with webhook delivery. One call takes a creator from a filter match to a contactable record — profile, engaged-audience interests resolved to sub-niche across 32 interests and 413 sub-niches, sponsored-post history and a validated email — for 1 credit, as low as $0.23 on the Pro plan, as published.
The honest trade. HypeAuditor is ahead on the program layer, on modelled commercial estimates that Influencers.club does not publish at all — post and story rate ranges, CPM, CPE, EMV per dollar, reach and impressions — on audience dimensions Influencers.club does not carry, including income, education, marital status, ethnicity and comment sentiment, and on published TikTok, YouTube and Twitch coverage. Influencers.club is ahead on access and published pricing, on the contact layer and its validation, on Instagram, X and OnlyFans coverage, on identity breadth, on webhook delivery, and on getting a complete record in one call at a price you can read before you buy. Both ship a first-party MCP server, so neither has an agent gap.
On commercials: Influencers.club is from $208/month on the Pro plan as published, cancel monthly, with 10 free production credits and no card. HypeAuditor publishes plans for its platform but no API price list; its documentation directs API buyers to sales, and its account model meters discovery requests and report credits as two separate quotas on two separate plans.
Access, the contact layer, and one call per creator
Live in minutes, priced in public: a trial key on signup with 10 production credits and no card, then from $208/month on the Pro plan as published, cancel monthly, credits rolling over. One credit returns the whole record synchronously — profile, two-layer creator niche, engaged-audience interests, sponsored posts and a validated email — against a search-then-unlock pattern that is asynchronous on four of six platforms. A validated email on every one of 340M+ profiles, reverse lookup from an email address at 0.05 credits, linked accounts across 47 platforms, engaged-audience interests resolved to sub-niche — 32 interests across 413 sub-niches with affinity scores, on all six platforms — and campaign monitoring that pushes events by webhook rather than waiting to be polled.
The program layer, and the money math around a creator
The win is everything built on top of the data. On coverage the two split three platforms each: HypeAuditor publishes more accounts on TikTok, YouTube and Twitch, Influencers.club returns more contact-carrying profiles on Instagram, X and OnlyFans. Its published specifications document campaigns, influencer rosters, posts, stories and drafts, auto-tracking of mentions, media plans, e-commerce reporting with revenue, ROI and commission, and spend reporting with paid and planned payments — a program surface Influencers.club does not offer at all. The report carries modelled commercial estimates Influencers.club does not publish: post and story price ranges, CPM, CPE, EMV per dollar, reach and impressions, and worldwide, country and category rankings. Social-listening listeners on a hashtag, keyword or mention surface new creators on Instagram and TikTok. Its agent surface is a peer rather than a gap: a first-party hosted MCP server, a published Claude plugin with twelve commands and a skill, and an llms.txt index. And the Audience Quality Score remains the authenticity grade the category benchmarks against.
Is the API feeding a pipeline, or running a program?
If the API is the system of record for campaigns — rosters, content, payments, attributed revenue — and the vetting score in front of a spend decision, HypeAuditor built that product and exposes it as endpoints. If the API feeds something else — a CRM, a data warehouse, an internal tool, an agent — and the job is to find creators, enrich them with audience analytics and a validated contact record, and get paged when they post, that is the Influencers.club shape, at published prices, starting today.
The HypeAuditor and Influencers.club APIs at a glance
This page compares APIs only, and it counts every API family each vendor publishes a specification for. On the HypeAuditor side that is four separate documents: the reports and Discovery reference, the Public API v1 specification, the Campaign Management v2 specification, and the Market Analysis reference. Features that exist only inside either dashboard are out of scope on both sides.
One API, one credit pool, one host. 21 documented endpoint groups, 72 operations. Discovery across six platforms with 90+ filters, similar creators, audience overlap, exclusion lists and free filter dictionaries. Enrichment by handle at four depths, by email in either direction, and in batch. Campaign monitoring with webhook delivery. API keys and OAuth. Documentation in LLM-readable Markdown with a first-party MCP server.
Analytical reports on six platforms carrying the Audience Quality Score, plus Discovery with 50 filters across five of them. Around that: metrics history, account media, brand mentions, a Suggester, taxonomy dictionaries, Report Connections, creator lists, PDF export and a creator CRM. Three further specifications add look-alike, social listening, batch email unlock and media plans; 31 campaign-management operations; and competitor analysis. A first-party MCP server and a Claude plugin sit on top.
What does the HypeAuditor API cost?
HypeAuditor publishes no API price list. Its platform plans are published on its pricing page; API access is quoted through sales, and the documentation describes the crediting mechanics without prices. Because a total cost per enriched creator cannot be computed from published figures, this page prints no HypeAuditor dollar figure anywhere — a per-unit rate without the plan it is metered against is half an equation.
The structure is what a buyer can plan around, and it is unusually granular. Report credits, mini-report credits and Discovery requests are three separate pools; the Public API v1 specification adds email-unlock tokens and a monthly look-alike request limit on top. Discovery volume and report volume are bought separately, so the ratio between them is a purchasing decision rather than a runtime one. Filter depth is also a plan gate: each Discovery filter carries a documented Basic or Pro availability, so audience age, income, ethnicity, look-alike and account geography sit behind the higher tier.
Influencers.club: from $208/month on the Pro plan, as published. One credit pool across every endpoint, credits rolling over between periods, cancel monthly, and 10 free production credits with no card before anything is paid. Every tier is priced separately, so a pipeline pays for the slice it uses: 0.2 credits for core profile with a validated email, 0.8 for audience analytics alone, 0.03 for raw, 1 credit for all of it in a single call.
| Detail | Influencers.club API | HypeAuditor API |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of entry | ||
| Entry price = your minimum first commitment | From $208/mo, as published | Not publishedThe API reference directs buyers to sales |
| API price list published | YesA published rate for every endpoint | NoPlatform plans are published; API pricing is not |
| Monthly billing available | YesCancel monthly | Not published |
| Self-serve to production | YesTrial key on signup, no card; paid plans via the pricing page | NoThe Basics page directs key requests to support |
| Free evaluation | Yes10 production credits on signup, no card | PartialA free sandbox search endpoint, and reports on a fixed set of demo handles |
| Unused quota rolls over | YesCredits roll over between periods | Not published |
| Unit economics | ||
| Billing unit | CreditsOne pool across every endpoint | Five separate metersReport credits, mini-report credits, discovery requests, email-unlock tokens and look-alike requests |
| Full record for one creator | Yes1 credit, everything included, one synchronous call across 11 enrichment platforms | Yes1 report credit per creator, unlocked for 365 days; price not published |
| Credits on a failed call | Not chargedCredits are deducted only when data is returned | RefundedA failed report is credited back, and an email unlock spends a token only on a new unlock |
| Cost per enriched creator, as computable | YesAs low as $0.23 on Pro, as published | Not computableNo API price is published, so a per-creator total cannot be derived |
| Rate limits | 300/minDocumented | Under 100/minDocumented |
| Discovery paging | Yes0.01 credits per creator returned | Yes20 per page, one request per page, capped at 500 pages |
| Full filter set on every plan | YesThe documented filter set is the filter set | NoEach Discovery filter is marked Basic or Pro availability, so depth is a plan gate |
| Contract terms | Monthly, cancel anytime | Not published |
What endpoints do the HypeAuditor and Influencers.club APIs offer?
Both surfaces are larger than a reports-and-search comparison suggests, and they are large in different directions. Influencers.club documents 21 endpoint groups and 72 operations behind one key and one credit pool, weighted toward data: four enrichment depths, enrichment from an email address in either direction, batch jobs, similar creators, audience overlap, exclusion lists and nine free dictionary endpoints. HypeAuditor spreads its surface across four specifications, weighted toward the program: reports and Discovery in one, look-alike, social listening, batch email unlock and media plans in a second, 31 campaign-management operations in a third, and Instagram competitor analysis in a fourth.
The tell is which endpoints cost nothing. HypeAuditor gives away the relationship layer — taxonomy, Suggester, unlock-status checks, Report Connections and the creator CRM all answered on a trial key with a zero balance on 26 August 2026 — and meters the data: reports, Discovery pages, email unlocks and look-alike requests. That is the shape of a vendor selling a campaign platform and charging for the records that fill it. Influencers.club meters the data too, and gives away the filter dictionaries.
The workflow difference is the one that shows up in code. Influencers.club returns the complete record in one synchronous call. HypeAuditor searches first, then unlocks a report per creator, and on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and X that unlock can return 202 with a retry interval, so an integration needs a polling loop that the one-call pattern does not.
| Detail | Influencers.club API | HypeAuditor API |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | ||
| Filtered creator search | YesSix platforms, 0.01 credits per creator returned | Yesauditor.search across five platforms, 1 request per 20-result page |
| Documented search filters | Yes90+ filters plus 50+ has_* presence booleans, six platforms | Yes50 filters across five platforms, each marked Basic or Pro |
| Natural-language search | Yesai_search, one niche per query, over profile data and filters | Yesniche_search takes a niche phrase; not combinable with the keyword filters |
| Similar / look-alike creators | YesA dedicated endpoint, billed at the discovery rate | YesA Discovery seed parameter, and a Public API v1 endpoint at 1 credit against a monthly limit |
| Exclusion lists | YesStored, reusable lists with a per-platform default | Yesusername_exclude, up to 1,000 handles inline per request |
| Vetting before enrichment | YesMatched-filter vetting at 0.03 credits per creator, replacing the base rate Unique | Not documentedQualifying a creator beyond the search row requires a report unlock |
| Result ceiling per query | Paginated, no documented row cap | 10,000 rows20 per page, 500 pages maximum |
| Enrichment and reports | ||
| Full record by handle | Yes1 credit, everything included, returned synchronously (11 enrichment platforms; audience block on the six full-profile platforms) | Yes1 report credit; generation is asynchronous on Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and X |
| Unbundled tiers | YesProfile with email at 0.2, audience analytics at 0.8, raw at 0.03 | YesA mini report on a separate credit pool, with contacts and the quality scores withheld |
| Reverse lookup from an email address | Yes0.05 credits Unique | Not documentedAbsent from all four published specifications |
| Batch enrichment | YesA job API with status, resume, download and per-entity billing | PartialBatch email unlock and batch unlock-status take 1 to 50 creators per call; reports are one per call |
| Cross-platform identity | YesLinked accounts across 47 platforms | YesReport Connections across its six platforms, free of credits |
| Connected socials as its own call seeded by platform + handle | YesA dedicated endpoint at 0.5 credits | YesReport Connections, no credit charged |
| Audience overlap between creators | Yes1 credit Unique | Not documented |
| Program and operations | ||
| Campaigns as API objects | YesCampaigns, creators, content, overview and report export | Yes31 documented operations covering campaigns, rosters, posts, stories, drafts and auto-tracking |
| E-commerce attribution | Not offeredOut of scope by design | YesA campaign report returning clicks, purchases, revenue, ROI, conversion rate and commission Unique |
| Creator payment tracking | Not offeredOut of scope by design | YesA spend report returning paid and planned amounts with a payment history Unique |
| Media plans | Not offered | Yes14 documented operations for plans, accounts, events and metrics |
| Standing keyword and hashtag listening | Not offeredContent keyword search runs on request, not as a stream | YesListeners on a mention, hashtag or keyword surface new creators on Instagram and TikTok Unique |
| Creator CRM | Not offered | YesA creator endpoint carrying network, contract and payment status against unlocked reports |
| PDF report export | Not offered | YesA documented PDF export endpoint across six platforms |
| Delivery and developer surface | ||
| Webhooks | YesNew posts, bio and link-in-bio changes, follower milestones Unique | Not documentedNo webhook or callback appears in either published OpenAPI specification |
| Quota and usage endpoint | YesCredits and usage endpoints | YesplanInfo for both quotas, plus live counters in every response envelope |
| Free dictionary endpoints | YesNine classifier endpoints for filter values | YesA taxonomy endpoint returning category, thematic and interest maps |
| Documentation for agents | YesServed in LLM-readable Markdown | YesAn llms.txt index and a Markdown version of every page |
| OAuth for third-party apps | YesRegistration, authorize and token endpoints | Not documentedAuthentication is a client ID and token pair |
| MCP server | YesFirst-party, local install and hosted connector, no access request | YesA first-party hosted server at mcp.hypeagent.io, plus a Claude plugin with 12 commands and a skill |
POST /public/v1/creators/enrich/handle/full/ → profile + metrics → creator niche + sub-niche (two-layer) → engaged-audience interests (32 / 413) → gender / age cross-tab / city-level location → audience credibility + reachability → validated email + phone → growth + posting frequency → monetization flags → sponsored posts + past sponsors → linked accounts on other platforms
POST /api/method/auditor.search/ → username, ER, followers → real_subscribers_count → audience-quality mark (bucketed) …then, per creator: GET /api/method/auditor.report/?username=… → may return 202 + retryTtl (poll back) → 63 top-level fields: demographics, AQS, contacts, rate estimates, EMV, brand safety
HypeAuditor API vs Influencers.club API: which one returns a creator you can act on?
The Influencers.club record is built to carry the whole decision, not to describe it afterwards. The same call that identifies a creator also qualifies them and makes them contactable: profile and metrics, a two-layer niche, engaged-audience interests resolved to sub-niche, audience credibility and reachability, monetization and brand-deal flags, sponsored-post history, linked accounts, and a validated email and phone number. Filter, qualify, contact — all inside the API, at 0.01 credits to discover, 0.03 to vet against matched filters, 1 credit to enrich the ones that survive. And if all a pipeline needs is the contact, the record unbundles: 0.2 credits returns core profile with a validated email and no audience block, against a HypeAuditor report that withholds contacts from its cheaper tier entirely.
The HypeAuditor record is a dossier you unlock once you already have a name. A live Instagram advanced report on 26 August 2026 returned 63 top-level fields, and the weight of them sits on a single spend decision: the Audience Quality Score, a follower-graph anomaly object, a brand-safety mark, post and story rate ranges with CPM and CPE, EMV with a per-dollar figure, estimated reach and impressions, and worldwide, country and category rankings. It is the deeper read on “should I pay this one creator”. It is not the thing that finds them, and it does not end with a contact you can use — contacts are advanced-tier only, carry no validation status, and there is no way to go the other direction from an email address.
Two absences are worth stating plainly, in both directions. Influencers.club publishes no rate estimates, no CPM or CPE, no brand-safety flags and no fraud-graph analysis; those are genuine HypeAuditor capabilities and no equivalent appears in the Influencers.club specification. HypeAuditor publishes no validation, verification or deliverability field on any contact it returns — searched across all 75 documented pages and all four OpenAPI specifications on 26 August 2026 — and no reverse lookup from an email address.
| Detail | Influencers.club API | HypeAuditor API |
|---|---|---|
| Identity and metrics | ||
| Core profile and engagement metrics | YesSix platforms | YesSix platforms; 63 top-level fields on a live Instagram advanced report |
| Historical time-series | YesGrowth and posting-frequency metrics | YesMetrics-history endpoints, and follower charts running back several years |
| Creator niche classification | YesA two-layer taxonomy, class and sub-class, on every profile | Yes48 categories, 130 thematics and 329 labels on Instagram, from the taxonomy endpoint |
| Cross-platform identity graph | YesLinked accounts across 47 platforms | YesReport Connections across its six platforms |
| Contact layer | ||
| Creator email in the response | YesValidated before delivery; a failed required email is not charged | YesA contacts object on the advanced report, and a batch unlock endpoint for 1 to 50 creators |
| Email validation status | YesThird-party verification before delivery Unique | Not documentedNo validation, verification or deliverability field appears in any of the 75 documented pages or the four specifications |
| Phone number | Yes | YesA phones array on the contacts object and on the creator CRM endpoint |
| Contacts on the cheaper tier | YesProfile with validated email at 0.2 credits | NoContacts are withheld from the mini report and returned null |
| Reverse lookup from an email address | Yes0.05 credits | Not documented |
| Vetting and commercial signals | ||
| Audience quality / fake-follower signal | YesAudience credibility as a score with a class label and histograms | YesThe Audience Quality Score, with a class label and a written explanation |
| Audience composition classes | YesFour classes | YesFour classes, plus an authenticity score benchmarked against a peer average |
| Fraud-pattern detection | Not offered as a separate signal | YesA follower-graph anomaly object and an organic-growth verdict |
| Brand safety | Not offered | YesA score, a mark and nine content flags Unique |
| Sponsored-post history | YesSponsored posts and past sponsors | YesSponsored versus organic post split, brand mention counts and brand categories |
| Modelled rate estimates | Not offered | YesPost and story price ranges, CPM and CPE with peer marks Unique |
| EMV and reach estimates | YesAggregated EMV on campaigns | YesEMV with a range, EMV per dollar, estimated reach and impressions per creator |
| Creator rankings | Not offered | YesWorldwide, country and category rank |
| Monetization signals | YesMonetization flags, brand-deal history and 50+ has_* platform-presence booleans | PartialA launched-advertising Discovery filter; no equivalent presence-boolean set documented |
Does the HypeAuditor API include audience demographics?
Yes, and on Instagram it carries dimensions Influencers.club does not offer at all: income across nine brackets, education across six levels, marital status, ethnicity and comment sentiment, alongside geography, language, age, gender and interests. Four of those — income, ethnicity, audience age and audience gender — are also Discovery filters, marked Pro-tier in the published filter table.
The two differences that decide this section are breadth and resolution. The full Influencers.club audience block runs on all six platforms rather than concentrating on Instagram, and its interest taxonomy resolves to a second layer — 32 interests across 413 sub-niches with affinity scores, against 82 Instagram interests on the HypeAuditor taxonomy. It is also priced on its own: audience analytics alone costs 0.8 credits, where HypeAuditor’s audience block is bundled into the advanced report and withheld from the mini report entirely.
Both sets are statistical estimates, modelled from observable audience signals rather than measured from platform analytics, and neither vendor publishes the sample size behind a given creator’s figures. That is true of the category, and it is true of both columns here.
| Detail | Influencers.club API | HypeAuditor API |
|---|---|---|
| Audience gender and age | YesWith a gender by age cross-tab | YesWith a gender by age cross-tab |
| Audience location | YesTo city level | YesCountries, states and cities |
| Audience language | Yes | Yes |
| Audience interests | Yes32 interests resolved to 413 sub-niches with affinity scores, on six platforms | Yes82 Instagram interests with affinity scores, from a documented taxonomy |
| Brand affinity | Yes | YesBrand categories on the advertising object |
| Audience credibility | YesA score, a class label and histograms | YesThe Audience Quality Score and a peer-benchmarked authenticity score |
| Audience reachability | YesFour buckets | YesA score with a class label and a peer average |
| Audience income | Not offered | YesNine brackets on Instagram, and an income Discovery filter |
| Audience education | Not offered | YesSix levels on Instagram |
| Audience marital status | Not offered | YesFour classes on Instagram |
| Audience ethnicity | Not offered | YesSix groups on Instagram, and an ethnicity Discovery filter |
| Comment sentiment | Not offered | YesPositive, neutral and negative shares with a score |
| Audience overlap between creators | Yes1 credit | Not documented |
| Platforms carrying the full audience block | Six | Instagram only, in fullTikTok and YouTube carry a subset; income, education, marital status and ethnicity are Instagram-only |
| Priced separately from the profile | YesAudience analytics alone at 0.8 credits | NoThe audience block is inside the advanced report, and withheld from the mini report |
HypeAuditor API vs Influencers.club: campaign tracking and monitoring
This is the section where HypeAuditor is clearly ahead, and it is worth being precise about why. Its Campaign Management v2 specification documents 31 operations: campaigns as objects, influencer rosters, posts, stories and drafts, auto-tracking of mentions, and eight reporting endpoints including e-commerce — clicks, purchases, revenue, ROI, conversion rate and commission — and spend, with paid and planned amounts against a payment history. Influencers.club does not offer e-commerce attribution, discount codes, order tracking or creator payments, and says so.
Influencers.club is ahead on one thing in this section, and it is the delivery model. Its monitoring family pushes events by webhook as they happen — new posts, bio changes, link-in-bio changes, follower milestones. Neither HypeAuditor OpenAPI specification contains a webhook or callback of any kind, searched on 26 August 2026, so an integration polls. It also publishes what monitoring costs: 0.3 credits per creator per day, everything included.
One access note. Campaign management, social listening, media plans and look-alike each sit behind their own entitlement. On 26 August 2026 a HypeAuditor trial key that could still pull reports returned 402 · No API access on all four.
| Detail | Influencers.club API | HypeAuditor API |
|---|---|---|
| Campaign as an API object | YesCreate, list, update and delete, with creators, content and overview | Yes31 documented operations across campaigns, rosters, content and reporting |
| Delivery model | Webhook pushEvents are delivered as they happen | PollingNo webhook or callback appears in either published OpenAPI specification |
| Add creators programmatically | YesFrom handles or a discovery list | YesAdd, remove and start tracking influencers on a campaign |
| Auto-tracking by mention | Not offered on campaignsMonitoring is seeded by creator | YesAdd and remove auto-tracking mentions on a campaign |
| Content objects | YesCampaign content and per-creator posts | YesPosts, stories and drafts, with editable post metrics |
| New-post and profile-change events | YesNew posts, bio changes, link-in-bio changes and follower milestones | Not documented |
| Aggregated campaign reporting | YesCampaign overview and report, with CSV export | YesOverview, engagement, audience, posts, influencers, spend and e-commerce reports |
| E-commerce attribution | Not offeredOut of scope by design | YesClicks, purchases, revenue, ROI, conversion rate and commission |
| Spend and payment tracking | Not offeredOut of scope by design | YesPaid and planned amounts, CPE, CPC, CPM and a payment history |
| Monitoring price published | Yes0.3 credits per creator per day, everything included | Not published |
| Available on a trial key | YesThe 10 free credits work across every endpoint | NoCampaign management returned 402 · No API access on 26 August 2026 |
How many creators does each API cover?
Both vendors publish per-platform figures, and the head-to-head splits three each way. HypeAuditor is ahead on TikTok by more than four times and ahead on YouTube and Twitch; Influencers.club is ahead on Instagram, ahead on X by roughly eleven times, and is the only one of the two covering OnlyFans. HypeAuditor is the only one of the two documenting Snapchat, which it does not include in its published total and does not make searchable in Discovery.
The two columns are not counting the same thing, and that is the load-bearing difference. HypeAuditor’s per-platform figures count accounts indexed. The Influencers.club bars count only the profiles Discovery returns today carrying contact data, which is a subset of its 340M+ headline across 47 platforms, and the dashed layer above each is the active-creator population rolling into Discovery. Neither vendor’s total is independently audited. HypeAuditor publishes no count of creators carrying contact data anywhere — not on its site, not in its API reference, not in its OpenAPI specifications.
One caveat on HypeAuditor’s total, quoted from its own pages. Its site publishes “227.1M+” on the home, discovery and pricing pages, and its own blog post comparing itself to Modash says HypeAuditor’s database “is over 142M”. Both figures were live on 26 August 2026. This page reports both as found and does not know why they differ. For symmetry: the Influencers.club per-platform rows below sum to roughly 256M against a published 340M+, and the reconciliation is stated above — the rows count a contact-carrying subset on six platforms, the headline counts profiles across 47.
Published creators by platform
Which API is better: HypeAuditor or Influencers.club?
Scored on API capability only, out of 5 per category across the same thirteen categories used on every comparison on this site, so the totals are comparable between competitors. Features available only inside either dashboard are excluded from both sides.
Influencers.clubHypeAuditorPick HypeAuditor if the API is running a program rather than feeding one. Campaigns, rosters, content, auto-tracking, media plans, spend and attributed e-commerce revenue are all documented endpoints, and Influencers.club offers none of them. The report is the strongest vetting payload in this comparison set — the Audience Quality Score, fraud-graph anomalies, brand safety, and modelled rate, CPM, CPE, EMV and reach estimates that Influencers.club does not publish at all — and on Instagram its audience block reaches income, education, marital status, ethnicity and comment sentiment. Standing listeners on a hashtag or keyword surface new creators on Instagram and TikTok, which is a discovery mode Influencers.club does not have, and it publishes more accounts than Influencers.club on TikTok, YouTube and Twitch. Its agent surface is a peer, not a gap: a first-party hosted MCP server, a published Claude plugin carrying twelve commands and a skill, an llms.txt index and a Markdown version of every documentation page. The costs are the access model and the price: four API families each require their own entitlement, keys come through sales, and there is no published API price to compare against anything.
Pick Influencers.club if the constraint is getting to production and knowing the bill. A trial key on signup with 10 production credits and no card, then from $208/month on the Pro plan as published with a rate for every endpoint, one credit pool instead of five separately metered ones, and credits that roll over. One synchronous call returns the whole record where the alternative is search, unlock, and poll for completion on four of six platforms. A validated email on every one of 340M+ profiles against no validation field anywhere in the other vendor’s documentation, reverse lookup from an email address, linked accounts across 47 platforms against six, audience overlap, matched-filter vetting before enrichment, and monitoring that pushes events by webhook rather than waiting to be polled.
Where each one falls short. Influencers.club has no e-commerce attribution, no discount codes, no order tracking and no creator payments; no rate, CPM or CPE estimates; no brand-safety flags or fraud-graph analysis; no standing keyword or hashtag streams; no media plans or PDF export; no audience income, education, marital status or ethnicity; and LinkedIn is enrichment-only, not searchable in Discovery. HypeAuditor publishes no API price list, gates four API families behind separate entitlements, ships no webhooks in either OpenAPI specification, documents no reverse lookup from an email address and no audience overlap, publishes two different database totals on its own properties — 227.1M+ site-wide against “over 142M” on its own blog — and no contact-data count at all, caps a Discovery query at 10,000 rows, gates filter depth behind plan tier, and carries no validation, verification or deliverability field on any contact it returns.
HypeAuditor API vs Influencers.club API: FAQ
How much does the HypeAuditor API cost?
Does HypeAuditor have a free trial or self-serve API signup?
What is HypeAuditor’s credit model?
Does the HypeAuditor API return creator email addresses?
Can I get a creator’s email without paying for the full report?
Can either API look a creator up from an email address?
Does HypeAuditor support webhooks?
How many creators does each database hold?
Which platforms does each API cover?
Does HypeAuditor offer social listening through its API?
Which API has better audience analytics?
Which API is better for finding creators at scale?
Which API is better for running a campaign?
Do either of these APIs work with AI agents?
How this comparison was put together
Every claim here was checked against a published artifact, and the API claims were checked against the running API. On the HypeAuditor side that meant all 75 pages of its public reference at hypeauditor.readme.io, plus the three OpenAPI specifications it publishes: Public API v1, Campaign Management v2 and Market Analysis. It also meant live calls. Using credentials issued during HypeAuditor’s own trial process, the report, Discovery sandbox, taxonomy, Suggester, Report Connections, unlock-status, batch email-unlock and creator endpoints were called on 26 August 2026, and the responses are what the endpoint, field-presence and error-behaviour claims on this page rest on.
Absence claims name the artifact and the search. "No webhooks" means no webhook or callback endpoint appears in either published OpenAPI specification. "No email validation field" means no validation, verification or deliverability field appears in any of the 75 documented pages or the four specifications. "No reverse lookup from an email address" and "no audience overlap" were searched the same way. Where HypeAuditor publishes no figure — API prices, per-platform coverage, contact-data counts, refresh cadence, contract terms — the page says not published rather than estimating, and rather than marking it as an absence.
No HypeAuditor price appears on this page, deliberately. HypeAuditor publishes plans for its platform and does not publish what API access costs on top of them. Printing one half of that equation against a complete Influencers.club figure would produce a comparison that is arithmetically defensible and substantively false, so the page prints the structure and states that the total is not computable from published figures.
Both databases are self-reported. Neither 227.1M+ nor 340M+ is independently audited, and the two vendors are not necessarily counting the same thing. Audience demographics from any vendor in this category, Influencers.club included, are statistical estimates modelled from observable signals rather than platform-verified analytics, and neither vendor publishes the sample size behind a given creator.
This page is published by Influencers.club, so read the scoring with that in mind. The thirteen scoring categories are fixed across every comparison on this site and are not chosen per competitor. HypeAuditor scores higher here than any other vendor compared on this site, and it takes four of the thirteen categories outright: adjacent products, and ties at the top on audience analytics and commercial signals, where its rate, CPM, CPE, EMV and reach estimates have no equivalent in the Influencers.club API at all. If something here is out of date or wrong, send a correction and it will be logged with a date.
Sources
- HypeAuditor site & database claims — hypeauditor.com
- HypeAuditor discovery & database size — hypeauditor.com/discovery
- HypeAuditor platform plans — hypeauditor.com/pricing
- HypeAuditor API overview — hypeauditor.com/api-integration
- HypeAuditor public API reference — hypeauditor.readme.io
- HypeAuditor documentation index for agents — hypeauditor.readme.io/llms.txt
- HypeAuditor Public API v1 specification — hypeauditor.com/swagger/public-api/v1
- HypeAuditor Campaign Management v2 specification — hypeauditor.com/swagger/campaign-management/v2
- Influencers.club API overview — influencers.club/influencer-api
- Influencers.club pricing — influencers.club/pricing
- Influencers.club API documentation — docs.influencers.club
- Influencers.club OpenAPI specification — docs.influencers.club/_bundle/openapi.yaml
- Influencers.club MCP server — influencers.club/creator-mcp
- Influencers.club data sourcing — influencers.club/our-data
All vendor pages and specifications retrieved 26 August 2026; live API calls made the same day. Corrections: support@influencers.club
Try the influencers.club API with 10 free credits
No card on the trial, no annual commitment.